Test and Development Data Generation
Producing realistic datasets for engineering environments, which removes the common and preventable practice of copying production records into development.
Custom Software
Hire Synthetic Health Data Engineers
Synthetic health data engineers generate artificial records that resemble real clinical data statistically without corresponding to actual patients. They handle generation methods, utility evaluation against intended use, and privacy leakage testing, since synthetic data is not automatically free of information about the people it was derived from.
The premise deserves scrutiny. Synthetic data generated from real records can leak information about those records, particularly for unusual patients, and a model that memorizes an outlier can reproduce a recognizable individual. Whether output is safe to share is a measured question rather than an assumption. Taction Software tests for it, and our hire dedicated developers hub covers adjacent roles.
Tell Us Your Requirements
Our experts are ready to understand your business goals.
Trusted Partners
Trusted by Industry Leaders Worldwide
Recognition
Awards & Recognitions
What Synthetic Data Engineers Build
The most reliable applications are internal: development environments, test data, and demonstration systems where the alternative is production records in lower-controlled environments. Applications involving external sharing or model training carry more demanding requirements. The work below reflects that. Utility evaluation appears prominently because synthetic data that does not support the intended use has cost effort and delivered nothing.
Structured Clinical Record Synthesis
Generating patients, encounters, labs, and medications with realistic distributions and temporal relationships, since independent field generation produces clinically implausible records.
Edge Case and Scenario Construction
Building datasets containing amended results, merged patients, and unusual sequences deliberately, which real samples rarely contain in sufficient numbers for testing.
Utility Evaluation Against Intended Use
Measuring whether the synthetic data supports what it was generated for, since statistical resemblance does not guarantee that a model trained on it transfers.
Privacy Leakage Testing
Testing whether generated records reveal information about the source data, including membership inference and reproduction of distinctive individuals.
Pipeline Integration and Refresh
Delivering generated data into development and testing environments with refresh capability. Our healthcare integration work covers source connectivity.
Privacy and Utility Context This Role Requires
Synthetic data sits between two failure modes. Generation faithful enough to be useful may leak information about source records; generation distant enough to be safe may not support the intended use. Managing that tension requires measuring both rather than assuming either. The context below spans the healthcare work you assign.
01
Synthetic Is Not Automatically Non-Identifiable
Models trained on real records can reproduce distinctive individuals. Whether output carries privacy risk is a measured question requiring testing rather than an assumption.
02
Outliers Carry the Most Risk
Rare conditions and unusual combinations are exactly what generation models memorize. Privacy risk concentrates in the patients most identifiable in the source data.
03
Utility Depends on Intended Use
Data adequate for interface testing may be useless for model training. Utility must be evaluated against the specific purpose rather than as a general property.
04
Clinical Plausibility Requires Domain Input
Statistically valid records can be clinically absurd. Reviewing generated data with clinical input catches combinations that testing against distributions does not.
05
Regulatory Status Is Not Settled by Being Synthetic
Whether generated data falls outside privacy obligations depends on analysis your privacy function performs, not on the label applied to the generation method.
06
Testing Data Is the Safe Application
Using synthetic data to eliminate production records from development environments is a clear improvement with modest requirements, and it is where most value sits.
Technical Skills This Work Requires
This is generative modeling with privacy testing and domain validation. The differentiating skills are utility measurement and leakage testing rather than generation technique, since producing plausible-looking data is easier than proving it is useful and safe. The competencies below reflect that. Weight evaluation on both dimensions above modeling sophistication.
Generation Method Selection
Choosing among statistical, model-based, and rule-based generation against the utility and privacy requirements, since methods differ substantially on both dimensions.
Temporal and Relational Consistency
Generating records where encounters, results, and medications relate plausibly over time, since independently sampled fields produce data that fails realistic testing.
Utility Evaluation Methodology
Measuring whether synthetic data supports the intended use, including training models on synthetic and testing on real where model training is the purpose.
Privacy Leakage Testing
Applying membership inference and nearest-neighbor analysis to detect whether generated records reveal source data, particularly for distinctive individuals.
Clinical Plausibility Review
Working with clinical reviewers to identify implausible combinations, since domain validation catches errors that statistical evaluation does not surface.
Edge Case Construction
Deliberately generating the difficult cases testing requires, which is frequently the most practically valuable output regardless of statistical fidelity.
How We Evaluate Synthetic Data Engineers
The distinguishing question is whether they tested for leakage. Engineers who assumed synthetic output was safe produced data whose privacy properties nobody established. Our assessment centers on privacy testing and utility measurement. Our delivery process includes review points where you can reassess fit.
Privacy Leakage Testing Performed
We ask how they verified generated data did not reveal source records. Engineers who assumed safety produced output with unmeasured privacy properties.
Utility Measurement Against Purpose
We ask how they knew the data was useful. Statistical similarity does not establish that a model trained on synthetic data performs on real data.
Outlier Handling
We ask what happened with rare patients. Generation models memorize unusual records, which is where privacy risk concentrates and where testing must focus.
Clinical Plausibility Validation
We ask who reviewed generated records clinically. Statistically valid data containing impossible clinical combinations fails realistic testing immediately.
Intended Use Scoping
We ask what the data was for. Engineers generating without a defined purpose could not evaluate utility and produced data of unknown adequacy.
Verified Production Experience
We describe which generation systems each engineer built and what consumed the output. We do not claim privacy or statistical credentials for engineers.
Engagement Options for Synthetic Data Work
Engagements should begin with the intended use, since it determines both the utility bar and the privacy requirements. Structures below reflect that. We also recommend the internal testing application most often, because it delivers clear value with modest requirements while external sharing raises questions that frequently outweigh the benefit.
Test Data Generation First
Producing synthetic data for development and testing environments. This removes production records from lower-controlled environments and carries modest privacy requirements.
A Single Engineer for One Use Case
Suits one purpose with defined utility requirements. One engineer maintains consistency in generation approach and evaluation across both dimensions.
Engineer With Clinical Review Access
Plausibility requires clinical judgment. Engagements without allocated review produce statistically valid data containing combinations no clinician would recognize.
Augmenting Your Data Team
Where you own data infrastructure, staff augmentation adds generation capability within your existing pipeline and governance standards.
Full Team for Data Platform Programs
A dedicated healthcare development team builds generation into data infrastructure so development and testing environments are supplied by default.
Fixed-Scope Generation Delivery
Where the purpose and requirements are defined, a fixed-scope build under our engagement models delivers generation with utility and privacy evaluation.
Tell Us What the Data Is For
Share the intended use and whether the data stays internal or is shared. Purpose determines both the utility bar and how demanding privacy testing must be.
Privacy Testing, Utility Limits, and Boundaries
Synthetic generation reduces but does not eliminate privacy considerations, and whether output falls outside obligations is your privacy function’s determination. We build to HIPAA-aligned practices where HIPAA applies; software cannot be HIPAA certified. We do not provide legal advice or privacy determinations about generated output.
01
Leakage Testing Before Any Sharing
Generated data intended for sharing is tested for membership inference and reproduction of distinctive records, with findings reported rather than assumed favorable.
02
Privacy Status Determined by Your Function
Whether synthetic output falls outside privacy obligations is a determination your privacy function makes with legal input, not a property conferred by the generation method.
03
Utility Reported Against Stated Purpose
Evaluation states what the data supports and what it does not, so nobody uses it for a purpose the evaluation did not cover.
04
Outlier Suppression Where Risk Concentrates
Generation for sharing suppresses or perturbs records derived from distinctive individuals, since that is where reproduction risk is highest.
05
Sensitive Category Generation Restraint
Generating from behavioral health records requires additional care. We built CHIPSS, a behavioral health system, where such data carried strict handling constraints.
06
Claims We Would Not Make
We would not describe synthetic output as inherently non-identifiable, omit leakage testing before external sharing, or present statistical similarity as evidence of utility.
Cost to Hire Engineers and Build Generation
Cost concentrates in evaluation rather than generation. Measuring utility against the intended use and testing for leakage are the substantial work, and generation without them produces data of unknown adequacy. We publish no figures on fidelity or utility, because those depend on your data and purpose. What we deliver is measured evaluation on both dimensions.
MVP or Single Module
$40,000 to $80,000
Generation for one purpose, typically test and development data, with clinical plausibility review, utility evaluation, basic leakage testing, and pipeline delivery.
Full Platform Build
$80,000 to $200,000
Generation across data domains with temporal consistency, edge case construction, comprehensive privacy testing, refresh capability, and governance documentation.
Enterprise Deployment
Starting at $200,000
Multi-source generation infrastructure supporting several purposes with privacy analysis, governance integration, and delivery across environments and teams.
Discovery Phase Scoping
Discovery is paid and time-boxed. It produces an intended use assessment, utility requirement definition, privacy risk analysis, method recommendation, and an itemized fixed-scope estimate.
Cost Drivers to Expect
Data domain scope, temporal and relational complexity, utility bar for the intended use, privacy testing depth, clinical review availability, and refresh requirements.
Ongoing Support Costs
Source distributions shift and requirements change. Budget for periodic regeneration, utility revalidation, privacy retesting, and pipeline maintenance as sources evolve.
Third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure, data subscriptions, and hardware are separate from engineering cost and itemised clearly.
Why Build Synthetic Data With Taction
Two questions matter. Whether the vendor tests for privacy leakage, and whether they measure utility against your actual purpose. Taction Software has built healthcare software since 2013, more than twelve years, with over 200 healthcare projects delivered and ISO 27001 certification. Leadership brings more than twenty years of personal experience in the field, which is separate from company age. Our wider case for Taction sits elsewhere.
Clinical Data Structure Understanding
We built Voyant Health, an EHR platform. Our healthcare case studies reflect knowledge of the relationships generated records must preserve to be usable.
Sensitive Data Handling Experience
We built CHIPSS, a behavioral health system, where source data sensitivity governed every use, including derived and generated artifacts.
Experience Under Regulatory Registration
We built Revive Ease and PainKare, both FDA-registered applications. That work informs how we document generation methodology and evaluation.
ISO 27001 Certified Security Management
Taction Software holds ISO 27001 certification covering our information security management practices. It certifies our internal processes and does not determine privacy status of generated data.
We Test Leakage Before Sharing
Generated data intended for external use is tested for reproduction of source records, and findings are reported even where they complicate the plan.
We Will Recommend Internal Use Only
External sharing raises questions that frequently outweigh the benefit. Recommending internal test data instead is a smaller engagement and a clearer improvement.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
We establish the intended use and utility requirements, assess privacy considerations with your privacy function, then present matched engineers for your approval.
One purpose runs $40,000 to $80,000, multi-domain generation $80,000 to $200,000, and enterprise infrastructure starts at $200,000. Compute and cloud costs are itemized separately.
Our delivery history includes the Voyant Health EHR platform, the CHIPSS behavioral health system, and the FDA-registered applications Revive Ease and PainKare, within more than 200 healthcare projects delivered since 2013.
No. Generation models can reproduce distinctive source records, particularly outliers. Whether output carries risk is a measured question, and whether it falls outside obligations is your privacy function’s determination.
Sometimes, and it must be measured. Statistical similarity does not establish that a model trained on synthetic data performs on real patients, which requires direct evaluation.
Redaction transforms real records to reduce identifiability. Generation produces artificial records, which changes the utility characteristics and shifts the privacy question toward leakage rather than detection.
Share the intended use, whether output stays internal or is shared, your utility requirements, your clinical review availability, and the engagement model you have in mind. We will test leakage before any sharing and recommend internal use where that suffices. We do not determine privacy status.