In today’s mobile-first world—where users spend an average of 4.9 hours per day on mobile apps and nearly 73% abandon applications due to poor visuals or confusing navigation—the pressure to deliver exceptional mobile experiences has never been higher. With the global app market projected to surpass $935 billion by 2025 and 137.8 billion+ downloads recorded in 2024 alone, standing out now requires far more than a good idea. It demands strategic design, disciplined planning, and the right software development service approach from day one.
This is where wireframes become the unsung heroes of modern mobile app development services. Often overlooked in the rush to start coding, wireframing creates the foundational blueprint that defines user flow, screen structure, navigation logic, and feature placement. Just as architects would never construct a building without detailed plans, experienced product teams and any high-quality software development service provider understand that building apps without wireframes leads to scope creep, costly rework, and frustrated users.
Wireframes bring clarity before complexity. They align designers, developers, stakeholders, and product owners around a shared vision—long before visual design or development begins. Within professional mobile app development services, wireframing plays a critical role in reducing risk, improving usability, accelerating development timelines, and ensuring that the final product delivers an intuitive, user-centered experience.
This guide explains why wireframes are indispensable in the mobile app development process, how they influence usability and success, and why they often determine whether an app becomes a user favorite—or fades into the graveyard of forgotten downloads.
Ready to build the next breakthrough AR application?
What is a Wireframe in Mobile App Development?
A wireframe in mobile app development is a visual blueprint or skeletal framework that represents the basic structure, layout, and functionality of your application screens. Think of it as the architectural plan for your app—a simplified visual guide that shows what goes where, how elements relate to each other, and how users will navigate through different screens, all before a single pixel is perfected or line of code is written.
Unlike high-fidelity mockups that focus on colors, fonts, and detailed graphics, or interactive prototypes that simulate the final user experience, wireframes deliberately strip away visual design elements to focus purely on functionality, content hierarchy, and user flow. This intentional simplicity serves a crucial purpose: it allows teams, stakeholders, and clients to concentrate on the fundamental questions—What features does the app need? How will users accomplish their goals? Is the navigation intuitive?—without getting distracted by aesthetic debates about color palettes or typography choices.
Mobile app wireframes typically use simple geometric shapes, placeholder text, and grayscale colors to represent various interface elements like buttons, images, navigation bars, forms, and content blocks. They map out the information architecture and demonstrate the relationship between different screens, showing how users move from one part of the app to another. This visual communication tool becomes the common language that bridges understanding between designers, developers, product managers, clients, and other stakeholders throughout the development process.
Why Wireframes are Crucial for Mobile App Success
Preventing Costly Design Failures
Research indicates that design alone consumes approximately 30% of mobile app development time, representing a significant investment that companies make in the development lifecycle. Without proper wireframing, this investment can easily be wasted on designs that don’t meet user needs or business objectives. Recent studies show that implementing wireframes can reduce design phase time by 50% and cut post-launch revisions by 36%, translating to substantial cost savings and faster time-to-market.
When you skip wireframing or treat it as an afterthought, you essentially commit to expensive guesswork. Design problems that could be identified and fixed in hours during the wireframing phase might require weeks or months to address once they’re coded into the application. The global wireframing software market’s projected growth to $5.5 billion by 2035 reflects the industry’s recognition that investing in proper planning tools pays significant dividends.
Validating Ideas Before Investment
Wireframes serve as an essential validation checkpoint before your team invests significant resources in detailed design and development. By creating mobile app wireframes, you can quickly test whether your app concept is feasible, whether the proposed features make sense together, and whether the navigation flows logically. This early validation helps you identify potential usability issues, missing features, or unnecessary complications while changes are still cheap and easy to implement.
According to industry data, 68% of design teams using wireframing cut wireframe creation time by up to 50%, allowing for rapid iteration and exploration of multiple concept variations. This speed enables teams to test different approaches, gather feedback from potential users, and refine ideas before committing to a single direction. The ability to fail fast and iterate quickly during wireframing saves enormous time and money compared to discovering fundamental issues after months of development.
Aligning Teams and Stakeholders
One of wireframing’s most valuable but often underappreciated benefits is its power to align everyone involved in the app development process. When you present stakeholders, clients, or team members with a detailed visual wireframe, suddenly everyone can see exactly what you’re building. This shared understanding dramatically reduces miscommunication and ensures that designers, developers, product managers, and business stakeholders are all working toward the same vision.
Mobile app wireframing creates a documented reference point that developers can follow during implementation, designers can elaborate upon in high-fidelity mockups, and project managers can use for tracking progress. This alignment is particularly crucial when working with distributed teams or outsourcing development, as wireframes provide clear specifications that transcend language barriers and geographic distances.
Types of Wireframes in Mobile App Development
Understanding different wireframe fidelity levels helps teams choose the right approach for each project phase and effectively communicate with different audiences.
Low-Fidelity Wireframes
Low-fidelity wireframes represent the quickest, simplest form of wireframing—often starting as hand-drawn sketches on paper or whiteboard drawings during brainstorming sessions. These rough drafts use basic shapes, simple boxes, and lines to represent interface elements without any detail about colors, images, or exact spacing. They’re perfect for initial ideation, rapid concept exploration, and early-stage stakeholder discussions.
The beauty of low-fidelity wireframes lies in their speed and flexibility. You can sketch multiple screen variations in minutes, try different navigation approaches, and iterate based on immediate feedback. This approach encourages creative thinking because the low investment makes team members comfortable proposing radical ideas without worrying about “wasting” elaborate design work. Tools like Balsamiq deliberately maintain this low-fidelity aesthetic even in digital form, using a hand-drawn style that signals “this is still open for discussion.”
Mid-Fidelity Wireframes
A bilateral or mutual NDA involves two parties where both sides disclose confidential information that requires protection. This type recognizes that valuable intellectual property may flow in both directions during the collaboration. Both parties agree to keep each other’s sensitive information confidential and face the same legal consequences for breaches.
When to use bilateral NDAs:
- Joint venture app development projects
- Strategic partnerships between companies
- Cross-border development collaborations
- Merger and acquisition discussions
- When the development agency shares proprietary methodologies or technologies
Consider a scenario where your company partners with a development firm that has created innovative frameworks or proprietary development tools. A mutual non-disclosure agreement protects both your app concept and their technical innovations, creating a fair and balanced legal framework for collaboration.
High-Fidelity Wireframes
High-fidelity wireframes approach the appearance of final designs, incorporating actual typography, realistic content, detailed spacing, and sometimes even brand colors. These wireframes closely resemble what users will ultimately see and interact with, making them excellent for final stakeholder approvals, detailed usability testing, and precise developer specifications.
While high-fidelity wireframes require more time to create, they eliminate ambiguity about the final product appearance. They’re particularly valuable when working with clients who struggle to visualize the final product from lower-fidelity designs or when creating documentation for development teams who need pixel-perfect specifications. Modern wireframing tools like Figma and Adobe XD make creating high-fidelity wireframes more efficient through reusable component libraries and design systems.
Interactive/Clickable Wireframes
Interactive wireframes add functionality to static designs, allowing stakeholders and users to actually click through the app flow, experience navigation transitions, and interact with interface elements. These clickable prototypes bridge the gap between wireframes and fully functional prototypes, providing a realistic sense of how the app will work without requiring any actual development.
Interactive wireframing has become increasingly popular as tools have made it easier to add interactivity. Studies show that 79% of successful design teams adopt clickable prototypes at the wireframe stage, leading to 36% fewer post-launch revisions. These interactive wireframes excel at user testing, investor presentations, and client demos, as they provide an experience that closely mimics the final product while remaining fast and cost-effective to modify based on feedback.
Key Benefits of Wireframing in Mobile App Development
Early Problem Detection and Resolution
The most compelling argument for wireframing is its ability to surface problems when they’re cheapest to fix. Issues with navigation logic, missing features, confusing layouts, or inconsistent patterns become immediately obvious in wireframes. Identifying these problems during the wireframing phase means fixing them requires only a few hours of design work rather than days or weeks of coding, testing, and debugging.
Research from Nielsen Norman Group indicates that design teams using wireframes can reduce critical usability errors by 41% in multi-platform releases. This dramatic improvement stems from wireframing’s ability to help teams think through user scenarios, test mental models, and validate assumptions before committing significant resources. When you discover that users can’t find a critical feature or that your navigation structure confuses testers, you can revise wireframes and retest within hours—a luxury impossible once development is underway.
Significant Cost and Time Savings
While creating comprehensive wireframes requires upfront investment, this investment yields substantial returns throughout the development process. Teams using professional wireframing practices report 34% fewer project revisions and 50% reduction in overall design phase time. When you multiply these time savings across the typical $50-$200 per hour cost of development resources, wireframing becomes one of the highest-ROI activities in mobile app development.
The cost savings extend beyond just time. By catching design issues early, wireframing prevents the cascade of problems that occur when fundamental flaws make it into coded applications. Avoiding even one major redesign during development can save tens of thousands of dollars in rework, making wireframing one of the smartest investments in any app development project.
Enhanced Communication and Collaboration
Wireframes dramatically improve communication efficiency across everyone involved in app development. Instead of lengthy written specifications or verbal descriptions that can be misinterpreted, wireframes provide clear visual documentation that everyone can understand and reference. Developers see exactly what they need to build, designers understand which elements need visual treatment, and stakeholders can evaluate whether the proposed solution meets business needs.
Modern wireframing tools with real-time collaboration features have amplified this benefit. Teams using cloud-based wireframing platforms report 33% shorter feedback loops as team members can comment directly on designs, suggest changes, and track revisions in real-time. This collaborative approach ensures that everyone’s expertise contributes to the final solution while maintaining a single source of truth for the project.
Superior User Experience Outcomes
Ultimately, wireframing’s greatest benefit is its impact on the final user experience. By focusing on functionality, user flow, and information architecture before visual design, wireframes ensure that apps are built on solid foundations. This user-first approach leads to more intuitive navigation, better content organization, and interfaces that align with user mental models.
Apps developed with comprehensive wireframing consistently achieve better usability metrics, higher user satisfaction scores, and lower abandonment rates. When you consider that 90% of users check privacy and security features before using an app and 73% abandon apps with frustrating navigation, the UX improvements from proper wireframing directly impact an app’s market success and long-term viability.
The Wireframing Process in Mobile App Development
Phase 1: Research and Requirements Gathering
Effective wireframing begins with thorough research. Before sketching a single screen, teams should conduct user research to understand target audience needs, behaviors, and pain points. Competitive analysis reveals what works well in similar apps and where opportunities exist for differentiation. Technical requirements and business constraints are documented to ensure wireframes reflect realistic possibilities.
This research phase establishes the foundation for all wireframing decisions. Understanding that your target users are primarily one-handed phone users during commutes, for example, fundamentally impacts how you structure navigation and place key interface elements. Similarly, knowing technical constraints like platform-specific guidelines or third-party API limitations prevents wireframing features that can’t actually be implemented.
Phase 2: Information Architecture and User Flows
With research complete, teams map out the app’s information architecture—how content and features will be organized and related. This includes creating site maps showing all screens and their hierarchical relationships, defining user flows that map how users accomplish key tasks, and establishing navigation patterns that provide consistent access to important features.
User flow mapping proves particularly valuable during this phase. By visualizing the steps users take to complete important tasks like onboarding, making purchases, or accessing key features, teams can identify unnecessary steps, confusing transitions, or missing functionality. These flows become the backbone of the wireframing process, ensuring that every screen serves a clear purpose in the user journey.
Phase 3: Low-Fidelity Sketching and Exploration
The actual wireframing typically begins with low-fidelity sketches—quick drawings that explore different layout options, navigation approaches, and content organization. This rapid sketching phase encourages experimentation and creative problem-solving without the commitment that comes with more polished designs. Teams might produce dozens of sketch variations in a single day, testing different ideas and identifying the most promising directions.
The low investment and high speed of sketching make it the perfect medium for collaborative ideation sessions. Team members can contribute ideas regardless of design skill, stakeholders can provide immediate feedback, and multiple approaches can be explored in parallel. Only after finding approaches that feel right does the team invest in more detailed wireframes.
Phase 4: Digital Mid-Fidelity Wireframe Creation
Once promising concepts emerge from sketching, teams create digital mid-fidelity wireframes using professional tools like Figma, Sketch, Adobe XD, or specialized wireframing platforms. These digital wireframes provide much more detail while maintaining focus on structure and functionality over aesthetics. Teams establish screen layouts, define content hierarchies, specify interaction patterns, and create consistent component usage across screens.
This phase involves significant iteration and refinement based on feedback from team members, stakeholders, and sometimes early user testing. The digital format makes sharing and revising wireframes much more efficient than paper sketches while remaining flexible enough to accommodate major changes based on feedback. Teams typically go through multiple revision cycles, progressively refining the wireframes until they accurately represent the intended app structure and flow.
Phase 5: Review, Testing, and Validation
Before moving forward, comprehensive wireframe review ensures that all stakeholders align on the proposed solution and that usability testing validates design decisions. Teams present wireframes to clients or business stakeholders for approval, conduct usability testing sessions where potential users attempt to complete key tasks, gather feedback from developers on technical feasibility, and revise based on insights gained.
User testing at the wireframe stage proves incredibly valuable. By observing real users interact with clickable wireframes, teams identify navigation confusion, discover unexpected user behaviors, and validate that the proposed interface supports user goals. Fixing issues discovered during wireframe testing costs a fraction of addressing the same problems after development begins.
Phase 6: High-Fidelity and Interactive Wireframes
For projects requiring more detailed visualization or interactive demonstrations, teams create high-fidelity wireframes that incorporate realistic content, actual typography, detailed spacing, and sometimes brand colors. Interactive features can be added to simulate navigation, demonstrate animations, and provide a realistic preview of the final experience.
These polished wireframes serve multiple purposes: they provide detailed specifications for developers, create compelling presentations for stakeholders or investors, enable comprehensive usability testing, and serve as documentation for future reference. While requiring more time investment, high-fidelity interactive wireframes often eliminate entire cycles of revision by ensuring everyone clearly understands exactly what’s being built.
Phase 7: Handoff and Documentation
The wireframing process culminates in organized handoff to design and development teams. This includes comprehensive documentation of all screens and their relationships, specifications for interaction patterns and behaviors, notes on responsive design considerations for different device sizes, and asset organization for efficient design and development. Modern wireframing tools facilitate this handoff with features like automatic design specifications, component libraries, and developer-friendly export formats.
A well-documented wireframe set serves as the single source of truth throughout development, reducing back-and-forth questions and ensuring consistent implementation across the entire application. Development teams can reference wireframes when implementation questions arise, QA teams can use them for testing specifications, and project managers can track progress against the defined scope.
Best Wireframing Tools for Mobile App Development
Figma: The Modern Collaboration Powerhouse
Figma has rapidly become the industry standard for wireframing and design, particularly for teams requiring real-time collaboration. As a cloud-based platform accessible from any browser, Figma eliminates the file management headaches that plague desktop applications. Multiple team members can simultaneously work on the same file, commenting and suggesting changes in real-time. With AI-integrated features reported to boost productivity by 28%, extensive plugin ecosystem, and strong developer handoff capabilities, Figma excels for teams prioritizing collaboration and integration.
Pricing starts at free for individual use, with professional plans at $12 per editor/month and organization plans at $45 per editor/month. Figma works best for distributed teams, organizations with complex design systems, and projects requiring extensive stakeholder collaboration. The learning curve is moderate but worth the investment given the platform’s comprehensive capabilities.
Sketch: The Mac-First Design Tool
Sketch pioneered modern UI/UX design tools and remains a favorite among Mac users for its speed, power, and extensive plugin ecosystem. Unlike browser-based tools, Sketch’s native Mac application provides exceptional performance and intuitive keyboard shortcuts. The Symbol function allows creating reusable components that update across the entire project, dramatically speeding up wireframe creation and ensuring consistency.
Available exclusively for macOS at $10/month per editor with 30-day free trial, Sketch excels for individual designers or small Mac-based teams who value performance and don’t need extensive real-time collaboration. The platform’s maturity means outstanding third-party resources, plugins, and UI kits are readily available.
Adobe XD: The Creative Cloud Integration Champion
Adobe XD integrates seamlessly with other Adobe Creative Cloud applications, making it the natural choice for teams already invested in the Adobe ecosystem. XD combines wireframing, prototyping, and design in a single tool with auto-animate features for sophisticated interaction demonstrations. The platform supports voice prototyping and robust design systems for maintaining consistency across large projects.
No longer available standalone, XD comes with Creative Cloud All Apps subscriptions ($35.99/month promotional, $59.99/month regular with annual commitment). It’s best suited for teams using multiple Adobe tools, designers familiar with Adobe interfaces, and projects requiring integration with Photoshop, Illustrator, or other Creative Cloud applications.
Balsamiq: The Speed-Focused Wireframing Specialist
Balsamiq deliberately maintains a low-fidelity aesthetic optimized for rapid wireframe creation and stakeholder communication. The hand-drawn style signals “work in progress” and encourages feedback without defensiveness. With pre-built UI components, templates, and an incredibly shallow learning curve, Balsamiq excels at getting ideas out of heads and onto screens quickly.
Starting at $12/month for 2 projects with unlimited users, Balsamiq is perfect for early-stage ideation, non-designer-led wireframing, quick stakeholder presentations, and teams prioritizing speed over high-fidelity detail. Its simplicity is both its greatest strength and primary limitation—Balsamiq deliberately doesn’t try to be a complete design tool, focusing exclusively on wireframing.
UXPin: The Code-Based Design Innovation
UXPin stands out for its code-based approach to design, merging design and engineering into a unified process. The platform allows importing existing code, designing with actual components, and exporting designs as code, dramatically reducing design-to-development friction. With advanced prototyping capabilities including variables, conditional interactions, and expressions, UXPin enables creating prototypes that closely match final implementations.
Pricing starts at free trial with Basic plan at $14/month, Advanced at $29/month, and Professional at $69/month. UXPin excels for teams prioritizing developer handoff, organizations with established component libraries, and projects requiring sophisticated interactive prototypes.
Common Wireframing Mistakes to Avoid
Even experienced teams fall into wireframing traps that undermine effectiveness. One frequent mistake is adding excessive detail too early—including specific images, final copy, or visual styling before the basic structure is validated. This premature polish creates emotional attachment to specific solutions and makes iteration psychologically difficult and time-consuming.
Another common error is skipping user testing at the wireframe stage. Teams assume they understand user needs well enough or believe wireframes aren’t refined enough for testing. However, even low-fidelity wireframes provide valuable testing insights, and discovering usability issues before high-fidelity design or development saves enormous resources.
Many teams also fail to properly document wireframing decisions, creating problems when team members need to understand why certain choices were made. Without documented rationale, future changes might undo carefully considered solutions, and knowledge transfer to new team members becomes difficult.
How Taction Software Leverages Wireframing for Client Success
At Taction Software, wireframing forms the cornerstone of our mobile app development methodology. Before writing a single line of code, our expert design team works collaboratively with clients to create comprehensive wireframes that visualize every aspect of the planned application. This wireframing-first approach has repeatedly proven its value across our diverse portfolio of successful mobile applications.
Our process begins with in-depth discovery sessions where we thoroughly understand client objectives, target user needs, technical requirements, and business constraints. Armed with this knowledge, our UX specialists create initial low-fidelity wireframes for collaborative ideation with clients. This early involvement ensures client vision is accurately captured while benefiting from our extensive mobile app development expertise.
We then progress to detailed mid-fidelity wireframes using industry-leading tools like Figma, allowing real-time client feedback and iterative refinement. Our interactive prototypes enable stakeholders and potential users to experience the proposed app flow before development begins, identifying improvements while changes remain simple and cost-effective. This collaborative wireframing approach ensures that when development begins, everyone shares a clear, validated vision of the final product—eliminating costly miscommunication and reducing time-to-market.
Conclusion
In the competitive mobile app marketplace where user expectations continually rise and success margins narrow, wireframing is no longer optional—it’s essential. The wireframe in mobile app development serves as the critical bridge between abstract concept and concrete implementation, providing the structural foundation upon which exceptional user experiences are built. From preventing costly design failures and validating ideas before major investment to aligning teams and producing superior user experiences, the benefits of comprehensive wireframing far outweigh the initial time investment.
Whether you’re a startup founder with a revolutionary app idea, an enterprise planning digital transformation, or an agency developing for clients, adopting rigorous mobile app wireframing practices dramatically increases your likelihood of success. By starting with thoughtful wireframes, iterating based on feedback, testing with real users, and refining until the structure feels right, you set your project on a path toward creating an app that users genuinely love and actively use.
The tools, techniques, and best practices outlined in this guide provide everything needed to implement effective wireframing in your development process. The question isn’t whether wireframing matters—industry statistics and countless success stories definitively prove its value. The real question is whether you’ll leverage wireframing’s power to transform your app idea into a market success.
Ready to bring your mobile app vision to life with expert wireframing and complete development services? Contact Taction Software today. Our experienced team combines strategic wireframing with technical excellence to deliver mobile applications that exceed user expectations and achieve business objectives.
Frequently Asked Questions
A: These three terms represent different stages of design fidelity and functionality. Wireframes are low-to-mid fidelity structural blueprints focusing on layout, content hierarchy, and functionality without visual design details. Mockups are high-fidelity static designs incorporating colors, typography, images, and brand elements to show the final visual appearance. Prototypes are interactive simulations allowing users to click through and experience navigation flows and interactions, either based on wireframes (clickable wireframes) or mockups (high-fidelity prototypes). The typical progression is Wireframe → Mockup → Prototype → Final Product, though teams sometimes create interactive wireframes or skip mockups in favor of designing directly in code.
A: Wireframing duration varies significantly based on app complexity, team size, and fidelity level. Simple apps with 10-15 screens might require 1-2 weeks for comprehensive wireframing including iterations. Medium-complexity apps with 25-40 screens typically need 2-4 weeks. Complex enterprise applications with 50+ screens, multiple user roles, and intricate workflows might require 4-8 weeks of wireframing. However, time invested in thorough wireframing saves substantial time later—studies show comprehensive wireframing reduces overall design phase time by 50% and post-launch revisions by 36%. The key is balancing thoroughness with forward momentum, using iterative refinement rather than attempting perfect wireframes before proceeding.
A: The answer depends on your experience, project complexity, and resources. For very simple apps with straightforward functionality, founders with design sensibility can create effective wireframes using tools like Balsamiq or Figma templates. However, professional UX designers bring invaluable expertise in user psychology, information architecture, interaction patterns, and mobile-specific best practices that dramatically impact final app usability. Even if you create initial wireframes yourself, having professional designers review and refine them provides immense value. For medium-to-complex apps or when user experience is critical to success, investing in professional wireframing services almost always pays for itself through better outcomes, fewer revisions, and faster development cycles.
A: While free NDA templates provide a starting point, they rarely offer sufficient protection for valuable app ideas without customization. Generic templates may not address industry-specific concerns, jurisdiction-specific requirements, or your particular risk factors. Always have legal counsel review and customize any template before use. The cost of professional legal review is minimal compared to potential losses from inadequate protection.
A: Balsamiq excels for beginners due to its intentionally simple interface, hand-drawn aesthetic, drag-and-drop functionality, and minimal learning curve. Most people can create their first wireframe within an hour of starting with Balsamiq. Figma offers excellent beginner resources with free templates, tutorials, and a generous free tier while providing professional capabilities as skills grow. For those comfortable with technology, Figma might be the better long-term choice despite a steeper initial learning curve. Many beginners successfully start with paper and pencil before transitioning to digital tools once comfortable with wireframing concepts. The best tool depends less on features and more on which interface feels intuitive and doesn’t impede your ability to quickly externalize ideas.
A: Generally yes, particularly for native apps, though the extent of separation depends on your approach. iOS and Android have different design guidelines (Human Interface Guidelines vs. Material Design), navigation patterns, and platform conventions that users expect. Creating platform-specific wireframes ensures your app feels native and intuitive to each platform’s users. However, if building a cross-platform app using frameworks like React Native or Flutter, you might create one primary wireframe set with notes documenting platform-specific variations. The core user flow and content hierarchy often remain consistent across platforms, with differences primarily in navigation patterns, button placement, and platform-specific UI components. Start with a primary platform wireframe, then adapt for the secondary platform, noting where platform conventions necessitate different approaches.
A: Wireframes should be detailed enough that developers understand exactly what to build without frequent clarification questions, while remaining flexible enough to accommodate discoveries during development. As a practical guideline, wireframes should clearly specify all screens and their relationships, define all interactive elements and their behaviors, show content hierarchy and layout structure, indicate navigation patterns and user flows, and document responsive behavior for different screen sizes. However, wireframes don’t need to include final copy, specific colors or fonts (unless high-fidelity), exact pixel measurements, or final visual design assets. Many teams successfully use mid-fidelity wireframes with comprehensive annotations for development, creating high-fidelity designs in parallel with development rather than before it begins. The goal is clarity without over-specification—detailed enough for confident implementation but not so rigid that beneficial adjustments become costly.
