System and Data Inventory
Identifying where protected information actually resides, including systems, backups, exports, and environments nobody documented as holding clinical data.
Custom Software
Hire HIPAA Risk Assessment Consultants
The HIPAA Security Rule requires a risk analysis, and that analysis is an organizational activity your compliance function owns. Taction Software supplies the technical input it depends on: system inventory, data flow mapping, control assessment, and vulnerability findings that give the analysis something factual to work from.
Be clear about the division. We are a software engineering firm, not a compliance consultancy or law firm. We do not conduct the required risk analysis, determine risk levels, or produce the assessment document. We assess systems technically and hand findings to the people who own the analysis. Our hire dedicated developers hub covers remediation roles.
Tell Us Your Requirements
Our experts are ready to understand your business goals.
Trusted Partners
Trusted by Industry Leaders Worldwide
Recognition
Awards & Recognitions
What This Technical Assessment Produces
Risk analysis requires knowing where protected data lives, how it moves, and what protects it. Most organizations cannot answer those questions accurately, which is where technical assessment contributes. The work below reflects that, following practices in our HIPAA engineering guidance.
Data Flow Mapping
Tracing how information moves between systems, vendors, and environments, since flows determine exposure more than any individual system does.
Technical Control Assessment
Evaluating implemented access control, encryption, logging, and transmission security against what the Security Rule describes.
Vulnerability and Configuration Findings
Identifying technical weaknesses with their exposure, providing factual input the analysis weighs rather than conclusions about risk.
Non-Production Environment Discovery
Finding clinical data in development, test, and analytics environments, which is a common exposure organizations do not know they have.
Third-Party Data Flow Identification
Identifying where data reaches vendors and partners, since those relationships carry obligations and exposure the analysis must account for.
Regulatory and Clinical Context This Work Requires
The Security Rule requires analysis and management of risk to protected information. That analysis is organizational and periodic rather than technical and one-time. Technical assessment feeds it without constituting it. The context below spans the healthcare work you assign.
01
The Analysis Is Your Organization’s Obligation
The rule places the requirement on covered entities and business associates. It cannot be outsourced to a vendor, and no vendor performs it on your behalf.
02
Inventory Accuracy Determines Analysis Quality
Analysis of an incomplete system inventory produces conclusions about part of the environment. Discovery is where technical work contributes most.
03
Data Reaches Places Nobody Documented
Backups, exports, analytics environments, and vendor integrations hold protected information. Finding those is usually the assessment’s most useful output.
04
Risk Determination Requires Organizational Context
Whether a technical finding constitutes high risk depends on organizational factors engineering cannot evaluate, which is why determination stays with compliance.
05
Analysis Is Periodic, Not One-Time
The requirement is ongoing. Assessment feeding it recurs as environments change rather than being completed once.
06
Technical Findings Are Not Risk Levels
We report what exists and what is exposed. Assigning risk levels and determining acceptable risk belongs to your compliance function.
Technical Skills This Work Requires
The differentiating skills are discovery and data flow tracing rather than framework interpretation. The competencies below reflect that, with verification consistent with our quality assurance approach.
Data Discovery Across Environments
Finding protected information in systems, databases, file stores, backups, and environments outside the documented inventory.
Data Flow Tracing
Mapping how information moves between systems and to third parties, which requires examining actual integrations rather than architecture diagrams.
Control Assessment Against the Security Rule
Evaluating implemented safeguards against what the rule describes, identifying where implementation falls short of the addressable or required standard.
Vulnerability Identification
Finding technical weaknesses with their actual exposure, following approaches under our certifications and compliance practices.
Third-Party Flow Identification
Identifying vendor integrations and what data they receive, since those flows carry obligations organizations frequently underestimate.
Findings Documentation for Compliance Use
Producing findings in a form your compliance function can incorporate rather than a technical report requiring translation.
How We Evaluate Consultants for This Work
The distinguishing question is what they discovered that was not documented. Assessments confirming the existing inventory found nothing useful. Our assessment centers on discovery capability and scope discipline. Our delivery process includes review points where you can reassess fit.
Undocumented Data Discovery
We ask what they found that nobody knew about. Assessments confirming the documented inventory contributed little to the analysis.
Data Flow Tracing Method
We ask how they mapped flows. Consultants working from architecture diagrams documented intent rather than what actually moves.
Non-Production Findings
We ask about clinical data in test environments. Consultants who did not examine those missed a common and significant exposure.
Third-Party Flow Identification
We ask how vendor data flows were found. Integrations frequently send more than the relationship owner believes they do.
Scope Discipline
We ask what they declined to determine. Consultants assigning risk levels made determinations belonging to your compliance function.
Verified Assessment Experience
We describe which environments each consultant assessed and what they produced. We do not claim compliance credentials for consultants who lack them.
Engagement Options for Assessment Work
Engagements should be scoped as technical input to your analysis rather than as the analysis. Structures below reflect that, and our engagement models accommodate assessment or ongoing arrangements.
Discovery and Inventory Engagement
Finding where protected information actually resides and how it moves, which is frequently the most valuable input to the analysis.
Technical Control Assessment
Evaluating implemented safeguards with findings documented for your compliance function’s incorporation into the analysis.
Assessment With Remediation Support
Combining assessment with engineering to address findings, since identifying gaps without capacity to close them delays improvement.
Augmenting Your Compliance Function
Where you conduct the analysis, staff augmentation adds technical assessment capacity within your existing methodology.
Full Team With Assessment Built In
A dedicated healthcare development team can include periodic technical assessment alongside development, keeping inventory current as systems change.
Fixed-Scope Assessment Delivery
Where the environment scope is defined, a fixed-scope engagement delivers discovery, control assessment, and documented findings.
Tell Us What You Think You Have
Share your documented system inventory. Discovery frequently finds protected information in places the inventory does not list.
Scope Boundaries and What We Do Not Do
We do not conduct the required risk analysis, determine risk levels, produce the assessment document, or provide legal advice. Those belong to your compliance function and counsel. We build to HIPAA-aligned practices where HIPAA applies; software cannot be HIPAA certified, and no vendor can guarantee compliance.
01
The Required Analysis Is Not Ours to Perform
The Security Rule places the obligation on your organization. We supply technical findings; the analysis, risk determination, and documentation remain yours.
02
We Report Findings, Not Risk Levels
We describe what exists and what is exposed. Assigning risk and determining acceptable levels requires organizational context outside engineering.
03
We Do Not Provide Legal Advice
Interpretation of regulatory obligation belongs to your counsel. We assess systems technically rather than advising on what the rule requires.
04
Discovery Is Point-in-Time
Findings reflect the environment as assessed. Environments change, and the analysis obligation is periodic rather than satisfied once.
05
Sensitive Data Discovery Care
Assessment encounters behavioral health data requiring restricted handling. We built CHIPSS, a behavioral health system, where such controls were foundational.
06
Claims We Would Not Make
We would not describe our work as the required risk analysis, assign risk levels, produce the assessment document, or suggest our involvement satisfies the obligation.
Cost to Engage Technical Assessment
Cost tracks environment size and discovery scope rather than framework interpretation. Remediation is separate and follows from findings. We publish no figures on risk reduction, because risk determination is not ours to make.
- 01
MVP or Single Module
$40,000 to $80,000
Discovery and control assessment for a bounded environment with data flow mapping and documented findings for your compliance function.
- 02
Full Platform Build
$80,000 to $200,000
Assessment across a system estate with comprehensive discovery, flow mapping, control evaluation, third-party identification, and remediation support.
- 03
Enterprise Deployment
Starting at $200,000
Multi-facility assessment with environment discovery across sites, coordinated findings, and remediation across clinical environments.
- 04
Discovery Phase Scoping
Discovery is paid and time-boxed. It produces an initial inventory finding, scope recommendation, and an itemized fixed-scope estimate for fuller assessment.
- 05
Cost Drivers to Expect
Environment size and complexity, undocumented system prevalence, third-party integration count, non-production environment scope, and facility count.
- 06
Ongoing Support Costs
The analysis obligation is periodic and environments change. Budget for reassessment as systems are added and remediation as findings arise.
Third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure, data subscriptions, and hardware are separate from engineering cost and itemised clearly.
Compliance consulting, legal advisory, and the risk analysis itself are entirely separate from our scope.
Why Engage Technical Assessment Through Taction
Two questions matter. Whether the consultant discovers what is undocumented, and whether they stay within technical scope. Taction Software has built healthcare software since 2013, more than twelve years, with over 200 healthcare projects delivered and ISO 27001 certification. Leadership brings more than twenty years of personal experience in the field, which is separate from company age.
ISO 27001 Certified Information Security
Taction Software holds ISO 27001 certification covering our own information security management, which reflects operating under external assessment ourselves.
Clinical Systems Built From the Inside
We built Voyant Health, an EHR platform, and CHIPSS, a behavioral health system, which informs where clinical data typically accumulates unnoticed.
Experience Under Regulatory Registration
We built Revive Ease and PainKare, both FDA-registered applications. That work informs how we document findings for regulated review.
We Find What Is Not Documented
Discovery targets systems, backups, exports, and environments outside the inventory, which is where assessment contributes most to the analysis.
We Do Not Assign Risk Levels
Risk determination requires organizational context we do not have. Reporting findings without assigning levels keeps the determination where it belongs.
We Will Say the Gap Is Not Technical
Where findings concern policy, training, or agreements, we report that rather than proposing engineering that would not address them.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
We scope the environment with your compliance function, conduct discovery and control assessment, then deliver findings for incorporation into your analysis.
Bounded assessment runs $40,000 to $80,000, estate-wide assessment $80,000 to $200,000, and multi-facility work starts at $200,000. Remediation is scoped separately.
No. The Security Rule places that obligation on your organization. We supply technical findings; the analysis and risk determination remain yours.
Most commonly, protected information in places nobody documented: backups, exports, analytics environments, test systems, and vendor integrations sending more than expected.
No. We report what exists and what is exposed. Risk determination requires organizational context that belongs to your compliance function.
Compliance engineers implement and evidence controls. This work assesses what exists and where data resides, producing input the analysis uses.
Share your documented system inventory, your compliance function’s methodology, your third-party integrations, and the engagement model you have in mind. We will report findings without assigning risk levels. We do not perform the required analysis.