Submission Planning and Tracking
Submission planning coordinates content, timelines, and dependencies across contributing functions, replacing the spreadsheets most teams maintain alongside systems.
Custom Software
Pharma Regulatory Information Management Development
Regulatory information management systems track submissions, product registrations, health authority correspondence, and regulatory commitments across markets. Submissions are prepared by the system and transmitted only after regulatory affairs approval, since a filing carries legal weight that no automated process should assume.
Regulatory information is the record of what a company told health authorities and what it committed to in return, which makes RIM systems both operational tooling and institutional memory. Taction Software builds pharma regulatory information management capability where registration status, commitment tracking, and submission history remain reliable across the decades a product may remain marketed.
Tell Us Your Requirements
Our experts are ready to understand your business goals.
Trusted Partners
Trusted by Industry Leaders Worldwide
Recognition
Awards & Recognitions
What Is Regulatory Information Management
Pharma regulatory information management covers the systems tracking regulatory activity: submission planning and content assembly, eCTD publishing and lifecycle management, product registration status by market, health authority correspondence and question handling, regulatory commitment tracking, and structured product data increasingly required under IDMP. The defining requirement is durability, since registration and commitment records must stay accurate for as long as the product is marketed. Our work sits within our broader pharma and life sciences practice.
eCTD Lifecycle Management
eCTD publishing and lifecycle tracking maintain sequence integrity across amendments, since a broken lifecycle complicates every subsequent submission.
Product Registration Tracking
Registration status by market and presentation is maintained with effective dating, since approval conditions vary and change across jurisdictions.
Health Authority Correspondence
Correspondence management tracks questions, responses, and deadlines, since missed response dates carry consequences disproportionate to the effort involved.
Regulatory Commitment Tracking
Commitments made during approval require follow-through years later, and losing track of them is a recurring source of regulatory difficulty.
Structured Product Data
IDMP and structured data requirements demand product information in defined formats, requiring data governance rather than document management alone.
Core Regulatory Information Management Services
Our pharma regulatory information management services cover RIM platform development, submission tooling, registration tracking, correspondence workflow, and validated delivery. Most engagements involve integration and extension rather than replacement, since established RIM platforms handle submission publishing well and migration of registration history carries real risk. Engagements typically open with a review of current system fragmentation and where regulatory teams maintain parallel tracking outside official systems.
01
RIM Platform Development
Where custom capability is warranted, we build registration tracking and workflow with the data model regulatory operations actually requires.
02
Submission Content Management
Content assembly coordinates documents across contributing functions, drawing on our content management work for version control.
03
Registration Data Management
Registration data is maintained with effective dating and market-specific attributes, since approval conditions differ substantially across jurisdictions.
04
Correspondence and Commitment Workflow
Commitment tracking links obligations to owners and deadlines, surfacing them before they become findings rather than after.
05
Systems Integration
Integration spans quality, clinical, and manufacturing systems, drawing on our enterprise application integration practice.
06
Part 11 Validated Delivery
RIM systems support regulatory obligations. Our 21 CFR Part 11 for AI work covers audit trails and computer system validation.
Benefits of Purpose-Built RIM Capability
The benefits concentrate in registration accuracy, commitment visibility, and reduced parallel tracking. Regulatory teams maintain shadow spreadsheets because official systems frequently cannot answer basic questions about current registration status across markets, and that shadow tracking is where errors originate. We publish no figures on submission cycle time, approval rates, or compliance improvement, because those depend entirely on portfolio, markets, and regulatory strategy.
Reliable Registration Status
Accurate registration tracking answers what is approved where and under what conditions, which fragmented systems frequently cannot do reliably.
Visible Commitments
Commitment tracking surfaces obligations before deadlines rather than after, addressing a recurring source of avoidable regulatory difficulty.
Reduced Parallel Tracking
Systems that answer regulatory questions directly reduce the shadow spreadsheets where version conflicts and errors originate.
Cleaner Submission Assembly
Coordinated content management reduces the assembly effort and version confusion that consume regulatory operations time before every filing.
Institutional Memory Preserved
Durable records preserve submission history across staff turnover, which matters when a question about a decade-old commitment arises.
Evidence Continuity
Regulatory data connects with evidence work, complementing our real world evidence platform capabilities for post-approval obligations.
Our Regulatory Information Management Process
We deliver pharma regulatory information management projects in gated phases so regulatory, quality, and IT stakeholders approve direction before engineering cost accumulates. Discovery establishes current system landscape, data quality, and where teams maintain parallel tracking, since those gaps indicate what the system must actually answer. Migration of registration history receives particular attention, because inaccurate migrated data is worse than acknowledged gaps.
Discovery and Gap Assessment
Discovery identifies where regulatory teams maintain parallel tracking, since those gaps reveal what official systems fail to answer.
Data Model Design
Registration data modeling handles market variation, effective dating, and product hierarchy, which generic document systems handle poorly.
Migration Planning
Migration of registration history is planned carefully, since inaccurate migrated records are more dangerous than documented gaps.
Workflow Development
Development is built with regulatory operations, since submission coordination tooling designed without them adds steps rather than removing them.
Validation Delivery
Computer system validation produces documented evidence appropriate to the system’s role supporting regulatory submissions and records.
Rollout and Ongoing Support
Rollout expands by region or product with data quality monitoring and continuing support as regulatory requirements and markets change.
Technology and Compliance
RIM systems fall under 21 CFR Part 11 for records supporting regulatory submissions, regional requirements including EU Annex 11, and evolving structured data obligations under IDMP. Taction holds ISO 27001 certification. The requirement deserving emphasis is that submission transmission remains a human decision: a filing carries legal weight and represents a company position, so systems prepare and validate while regulatory affairs approves and submits.
21 CFR Part 11 Compliance
Part 11 requires audit trails, electronic signatures, and validation for records supporting submissions, shaping architecture from initial design.
Submission Approval Boundary
Submission transmission is approved by regulatory affairs. Systems prepare and validate content; they do not file on a company’s behalf autonomously.
eCTD Lifecycle Integrity
eCTD lifecycle integrity must be maintained across sequences, since a broken lifecycle complicates every subsequent submission to that application.
Structured Data Requirements
IDMP and structured product data obligations require governed master data rather than documents, which is a data management problem.
Record Durability
Retention must span the marketed life of a product and beyond, so archival and readability across system generations are designed rather than assumed.
Deployment Security
Deployments run in your cloud tenancy or hybrid, with network segmentation, signed container images, and documented penetration testing before release.
Why Choose Taction Software
Taction Software was founded in 2013 and has spent over 12 years building healthcare and life sciences software, delivering more than 200 healthcare projects from four US offices in Chicago, Cheyenne, Austin, and Sacramento, with ISO 27001 certification. Our relevant discipline here is treating registration data as master data rather than document metadata. RIM implementations that model registrations as document attributes cannot answer the questions regulatory teams actually ask. Our leadership brings more than 20 years of personal experience in the field.
01
Registration as Master Data
We model registration status as governed master data, since document-attribute approaches cannot answer questions about approval conditions by market.
02
Migration Caution
We plan history migration carefully, because inaccurate migrated registration data is more dangerous than clearly documented gaps.
03
Established Healthcare Focus
Founded in 2013, we have concentrated on healthcare and life sciences rather than treating them as one vertical among several.
04
Integration Depth
Our work spans quality, clinical, and manufacturing systems, which regulatory information draws from across the organization.
05
Validated System Delivery
We produce Part 11 validation evidence as a work product rather than assembling documentation retrospectively before inspection.
06
Certified Security Posture
ISO 27001 certification means security controls are documented and auditable, supporting sponsor vendor qualification efficiently.
Pricing
Pharma regulatory information management pricing depends on scope, portfolio size, market count, migration complexity, and validation depth. Migration of historical registration data is frequently the largest and riskiest component, and we scope it separately. Most engagements extend existing platforms rather than replacing them. Discovery produces an itemized, fixed-scope estimate with phase-level breakdown. Platform licensing, publishing tools, and cloud infrastructure are separate from engineering.
MVP or Single Module
An MVP covering registration tracking or commitment management typically runs $40,000 to $80,000 with proportionate validation.
Full Platform Build
A full platform with submission planning, registration data, correspondence, and integration typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000.
Enterprise Deployment
Enterprise engagements covering global portfolios, migration, IDMP data management, and full validation start at $200,000.
Discovery Phase Scoping
Discovery is a paid, time-boxed phase producing an itemized estimate, architecture plan, and migration risk assessment.
Cost Drivers to Expect
Migration scope, market count, portfolio size, and validation depth are the largest variables, identified during discovery for realistic budget planning.
Ongoing Support Costs
Post-launch regulatory changes, market additions, revalidation, and support are quoted separately as a retainer sized to portfolio breadth.
Get Started
If you are evaluating pharma regulatory information management work for registration tracking, submission planning, correspondence workflow, or commitment management, the fastest next step is a discovery call with our team. We will assess current gaps and migration risk, then return an itemized, fixed-scope estimate. Contact us to schedule that conversation.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Regulatory operations leaders evaluating pharma regulatory information management work usually ask about migration risk, whether replacement is justified, and how commitment tracking actually gets maintained. The answers below reflect how we scope these projects.
Usually not. Established platforms handle submission publishing and document management well, and migrating registration history carries genuine risk. Most problems clients describe involve reporting, registration data quality, or commitment tracking, which are addressable through extension rather than replacement.
Risky enough that we scope it separately and plan validation carefully. Inaccurate migrated registration data is worse than acknowledged gaps, because teams trust it. We typically recommend migrating with verification against source records rather than bulk transfer with sampling.
Through assigned ownership with deadline surfacing, not through a list nobody reviews. Commitments made during approval come due years later, frequently after the responsible person has moved on. The system has to surface them proactively rather than requiring someone to remember to check.
An MVP covering registration tracking runs $40,000 to $80,000. A full platform typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000. Enterprise global deployments with migration start at $200,000. Migration scope and market count drive cost more than portfolio size alone.
No. It prepares, validates, and packages content, and regulatory affairs approves and transmits. A submission is a company position carrying legal weight, and automated filing would remove accountable human judgment from a decision that requires it.
Where in scope, yes, though IDMP is a data governance problem more than a system feature. It requires structured product information maintained as master data, which many organizations do not currently hold in that form. We assess readiness during discovery rather than assuming the data exists.