Rebate Processing
Rebate processing validates utilization submissions against contract terms, since submitted claims frequently include units outside eligible scope or period.
Custom Software
Pharma Managed Markets Software Development
Managed markets software processes rebates and chargebacks, determines class of trade, calculates government pricing including AMP and Best Price, and prevents duplicate discounts under 340B. Government price reporting errors carry False Claims Act exposure, which makes calculation accuracy and auditability the defining requirements rather than processing throughput.
Managed markets is the area of pharma commercial operations where software errors become legal liability. Misstated government pricing has produced substantial settlements, and duplicate discounts under 340B are a recognized enforcement focus. Taction Software builds pharma managed markets software where calculation traceability and control evidence are engineered rather than added for audit.
Tell Us Your Requirements
Our experts are ready to understand your business goals.
Trusted Partners
Trusted by Industry Leaders Worldwide
Recognition
Awards & Recognitions
What Is Managed Markets Software
Pharma managed markets software administers contracted pricing across the distribution and payer landscape: rebate agreements with plans and PBMs, chargebacks from wholesalers, class of trade determination, government pricing calculations including AMP, Best Price, and federal ceiling prices, and 340B duplicate discount prevention. These calculations are interconnected, since a commercial rebate can affect Best Price and therefore Medicaid liability. Our work sits within our broader pharma and life sciences practice.
Chargeback Validation
Chargeback validation confirms wholesaler claims match contracted eligibility, preventing payment on transactions that do not qualify.
Class of Trade Determination
Class of trade assignment determines which pricing applies to each customer, and errors here propagate into government price calculations directly.
Government Price Calculation
AMP and Best Price calculations follow statutory methodology, with full traceability since these figures carry False Claims Act exposure if misstated.
340B Duplicate Discount Prevention
Duplicate discount prevention identifies units eligible for 340B pricing and Medicaid rebate simultaneously, which is a recognized enforcement focus.
Contract Performance Tracking
Contract performance measures whether negotiated terms deliver expected access and volume, informing renewal decisions made by contracting teams.
Core Managed Markets Services
Our pharma managed markets services cover rebate and chargeback processing, government pricing engines, class of trade management, 340B controls, and contract analytics. The requirement shaping every engagement is traceability: every reported price must be reconstructable from source transactions through each calculation step. Systems where analysts adjust figures without audit trail create the exposure these calculations are supposed to manage. Engagements typically open with a review of current calculation methodology and control gaps.
01
Rebate Processing Automation
Rebate validation checks submissions against contract terms and eligible utilization, flagging exceptions rather than paying on unvalidated claims.
02
Chargeback Systems
Chargeback processing validates wholesaler submissions against contract eligibility and pricing, with dispute workflow for exceptions.
03
Government Pricing Engine
Price calculation implements statutory methodology with full traceability from transaction through restatement, since accuracy carries legal consequence.
04
Class of Trade Management
Customer classification is maintained with effective dating, since class changes affect which prices apply and flow into government calculations.
05
Data Platform Foundation
Platform work draws on our healthcare data warehouse and data engineering practices for transaction processing.
06
Contract and Analytics Delivery
Contract data management uses our healthcare contract management work, with reporting through Microsoft Power BI where that stack fits.
Benefits of Purpose-Built Managed Markets Software
The benefits concentrate in calculation accuracy, audit defensibility, and reduced manual processing. Government pricing calculated in spreadsheets is common and genuinely risky, since neither the methodology nor the adjustments are reliably documented. Duplicate discount prevention also depends on data matching that manual processes handle poorly. We publish no figures on rebate accuracy, recovery, or savings, because those depend entirely on your contract portfolio and current process maturity.
Traceable Price Calculation
Full traceability from transaction to reported price means calculations can be explained during audit rather than defended from memory.
Reduced Overpayment
Validation against contract terms prevents rebate and chargeback payment on ineligible units, which manual review catches inconsistently at volume.
Duplicate Discount Control
Systematic 340B matching reduces duplicate discount exposure, addressing an area under sustained enforcement and government attention.
Faster Period Close
Automated processing shortens period close for rebate accrual and government price reporting, which is frequently a manual scramble.
Consistent Class of Trade
Maintained customer classification with effective dating prevents the misclassification errors that propagate silently into statutory calculations.
Contract Insight
Performance data supports contracting decisions, complementing our market access analytics work on coverage and access outcomes.
Our Managed Markets Software Process
We deliver pharma managed markets projects in gated phases so contracting, finance, compliance, and IT stakeholders approve direction before engineering cost accumulates. Discovery establishes current calculation methodology, control gaps, and restatement history, since prior restatements indicate where methodology or data quality failed previously. Government pricing logic is documented and reviewed with your legal and compliance functions before implementation, because interpretation of statutory methodology is a legal question rather than an engineering one.
Discovery and Control Assessment
Discovery reviews current calculation methodology and control gaps, since restatement history indicates where data or methodology previously failed.
Methodology Documentation
Statutory methodology interpretation is documented with legal and compliance before implementation, since these are legal determinations we implement rather than decide.
Traceability Architecture
We design calculation traceability from source transaction through each step, so any reported figure can be reconstructed and explained under audit.
Processing Development
Development handles transaction volume and validation rules, with exception workflow rather than silent processing of claims that fail validation.
Control Testing
Control testing verifies calculations against known scenarios and prior periods, since correctness here has legal rather than merely financial consequence.
Rollout and Ongoing Support
Rollout is phased with parallel running against existing processes, followed by continuing support as statutory requirements and contracts change.
Technology and Compliance
Managed markets software operates under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program including AMP and Best Price reporting, federal ceiling price obligations, 340B program requirements, and the False Claims Act exposure that misreported government pricing creates. Gross-to-net figures also feed financial reporting, adding internal control requirements. Taction holds ISO 27001 certification. The requirement above all others is traceability, since a calculation that cannot be reconstructed cannot be defended.
Government Price Reporting Accuracy
AMP and Best Price misstatement carries False Claims Act exposure, which makes calculation accuracy a legal requirement rather than a quality goal.
Calculation Traceability
Traceability from source transaction through reported figure is mandatory, since defending a price requires reconstructing exactly how it was derived.
340B Duplicate Discount Controls
Duplicate discount prevention requires matching 340B-eligible units against Medicaid rebate claims, an area of sustained enforcement attention.
Restatement Handling
Restatements must preserve original calculations alongside corrections, since prior period reporting remains subject to review after amendment.
Financial Control Alignment
Internal controls apply where figures feed financial reporting, requiring change control and segregation of duties in calculation logic.
Deployment Security
Deployments run in your cloud tenancy or hybrid, with network segmentation, signed container images, and documented penetration testing before release.
Why Choose Taction Software
Taction Software was founded in 2013 and has spent over 12 years building healthcare and life sciences software, delivering more than 200 healthcare projects from four US offices in Chicago, Cheyenne, Austin, and Sacramento, with ISO 27001 certification. Our relevant discipline here is documenting methodology with your legal team before implementing it. Statutory calculation interpretation is a legal determination, and engineering teams that decide it independently create exposure their clients discover years later. Our leadership brings more than 20 years of personal experience in the field.
01
Methodology Documented First
We document statutory interpretation with your legal and compliance functions before implementation, since these are legal rather than engineering determinations.
02
Traceability by Design
We build calculation traceability from the start, because a reported price that cannot be reconstructed cannot be defended during review.
03
Established Healthcare Focus
Founded in 2013, we have concentrated on healthcare and life sciences rather than treating them as one vertical among several.
04
Transaction Processing Depth
Our data engineering work handles high-volume transaction processing with validation and exception handling rather than silent acceptance.
05
Control-Oriented Delivery
We build change control and segregation into calculation logic, since these figures feed both regulatory reporting and financial statements.
06
Certified Security Posture
ISO 27001 certification means security controls are documented and auditable, supporting pharmaceutical vendor assessment efficiently.
Pricing
Pharma managed markets pricing depends on scope, transaction volume, whether government pricing calculation is included, and portfolio complexity. Government pricing carries substantially higher control, documentation, and testing requirements than rebate and chargeback processing alone, and we scope it separately for that reason. Discovery produces an itemized, fixed-scope estimate with phase-level breakdown. Cloud infrastructure, data feeds, and third-party licensing are separate from engineering and itemized clearly.
MVP or Single Module
An MVP covering rebate validation or chargeback processing typically runs $40,000 to $80,000 for a focused product portfolio.
Full Platform Build
A full platform with rebate, chargeback, class of trade, and contract analytics typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000.
Enterprise Deployment
Enterprise engagements covering government price calculation, 340B controls, and multi-product portfolios start at $200,000.
Discovery Phase Scoping
Discovery is a paid, time-boxed phase producing an itemized estimate, architecture plan, and control gap assessment reviewed with compliance.
Cost Drivers to Expect
Government pricing scope, transaction volume, portfolio complexity, and restatement handling are the largest variables, identified during discovery.
Ongoing Support Costs
Post-launch statutory changes, contract updates, period close support, and control maintenance are quoted separately as a retainer.
Get Started
If you are evaluating pharma managed markets software for rebate processing, chargeback validation, government price calculation, or 340B controls, the fastest next step is a discovery call with our team. We will review current methodology and control gaps with your compliance function, and return an itemized, fixed-scope estimate. Contact us to schedule that conversation.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Contracting, finance, and compliance leaders evaluating pharma managed markets software usually ask about government pricing risk, 340B controls, and whether spreadsheet-based calculation is defensible. The answers below reflect how we scope these projects.
Increasingly not. Spreadsheets rarely preserve methodology documentation, change history, or traceability from source transactions, which are exactly what a review examines. Many restatements originate in spreadsheet errors that went undetected because nothing forced reconciliation. The exposure is legal rather than merely operational.
Your legal and compliance functions, not us. Interpretation of AMP, Best Price, and related methodology involves legal judgment, and we implement documented interpretations rather than making them. Engineering teams that decide methodology independently create exposure that surfaces years later during review.
Through systematic matching of 340B-eligible units against Medicaid rebate claims, with exception workflow where identification is ambiguous. Complete prevention depends on data availability from covered entities and states, so we build the controls achievable with available data and surface where gaps remain.
An MVP covering rebate or chargeback processing runs $40,000 to $80,000. A full platform typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000. Enterprise deployments including government price calculation start at $200,000, reflecting the additional control and testing requirements.
Original calculations are preserved alongside corrections, with full history of what changed and why. Prior period reporting remains subject to review after amendment, so overwriting original figures destroys the record needed to explain the restatement itself.
Sometimes, though parallel running against existing processes is mandatory before cutover given the consequences of calculation error. We typically recommend phased replacement with extended parallel operation rather than a cutover date, since discrepancies discovered during parallel running are exactly the point of the exercise.