Consultation Workflow
Consult management handles requests, triage, and response across inpatient units and community settings with differing urgency and documentation needs.
Custom Software
Healthcare Software for Palliative Care Practices
Palliative care is delivered alongside curative treatment rather than instead of it, which distinguishes it from hospice and shapes both its economics and its software needs. Programs bill fee-for-service or through value-based arrangements rather than per diem, making documentation of goals of care conversations both a quality requirement and a revenue mechanism.
Palliative programs frequently run at thin margins because the work is time-intensive and reimbursement is fragmented. Taction Software builds palliative care software supporting symptom assessment, goals of care documentation, and the billing capture that determines program sustainability. Hospice delivery is a distinct model covered by our hospice at home work.
Tell Us Your Requirements
Our experts are ready to understand your business goals.
Trusted Partners
Trusted by Industry Leaders Worldwide
Recognition
Awards & Recognitions
What Is Palliative Care Software
Palliative care software supports specialist palliative practice: consultation workflow across inpatient and community settings, structured symptom assessment, goals of care conversation documentation, advance directive and POLST management, interdisciplinary coordination, care plan development, and billing capture including advance care planning services. Unlike hospice, palliative care runs concurrently with disease-directed treatment, so coordination with treating specialists is continuous. Our work sits within our broader healthcare software development practice.
Symptom Assessment
Structured symptom assessment using validated instruments produces trackable data, since narrative descriptions make trajectory assessment impractical.
Goals of Care Documentation
Goals of care conversations are documented as structured records rather than narrative alone, supporting both continuity and billing capture.
Advance Directive Management
Directive and POLST records must be findable when needed, since a completed document nobody can locate provides no benefit at the moment of decision.
Interdisciplinary Coordination
Team coordination across physician, nursing, social work, and chaplaincy reflects how palliative care is actually delivered rather than physician-only.
Care Planning Support
Care plan development draws on our AI care plan generation work, with clinician review required for every generated element.
Core Palliative Care Services
Our palliative care software services cover consult workflow, assessment tooling, documentation, coordination, and billing capture. The economic reality shaping design is that palliative programs are frequently subsidized, so demonstrating value and capturing available billing both matter to program survival. Engagements typically open with a review of consult volume, documentation practice, and current billing capture rates.
01
Consult Request and Triage
Consult intake from referring teams captures the clinical question, since palliative consults span symptom management, goals clarification, and complex decisions.
02
Assessment Instrument Support
Validated instruments are implemented with automated scoring, producing comparable symptom data across encounters and clinicians.
03
Documentation and Billing Capture
Advance care planning documentation supports billing where time and content requirements are met, which programs frequently fail to capture.
04
Geriatric Care Coordination
Many palliative patients are older with complex comorbidity, connecting with geriatrics AI workflows for frailty context.
05
Community Program Support
Community-based palliative programs need visit scheduling and mobile documentation across a dispersed population outside hospital walls.
06
Chronic Illness Continuity
Palliative care spans long illness trajectories, connecting with chronic care management coordination.
Benefits of Purpose-Built Palliative Software
The benefits concentrate in documentation quality, billing capture, and coordination continuity. Palliative programs frequently under-capture available billing because advance care planning documentation requirements are specific and easily missed. Symptom trajectory also becomes assessable only with structured capture. We publish no figures on billing capture, symptom outcomes, or program economics, because those depend entirely on setting, payer mix, and current practice.
Improved Billing Capture
Advance care planning documentation meeting time and content requirements captures billing programs frequently deliver but fail to record properly.
Trackable Symptom Trajectory
Structured assessment makes symptom change assessable across encounters, which narrative documentation renders impractical over a long illness.
Findable Advance Directives
Directive accessibility means documents are available at decision points, addressing the common failure where a completed POLST cannot be located.
Better Team Coordination
Interdisciplinary records reflect how palliative care is delivered, since physician-only documentation loses most of the team’s contribution.
Demonstrable Program Value
Structured data supports the value demonstration palliative programs need when institutional funding is periodically reviewed.
Coordination With Treating Teams
Concurrent care coordination keeps treating specialists informed, since palliative involvement runs alongside rather than replacing their care.
Our Palliative Care Process
We deliver palliative care software projects in gated phases so clinical, administrative, and revenue stakeholders approve direction before engineering cost accumulates. Discovery reviews consult workflow and billing capture, since programs frequently deliver billable services without documenting them adequately. Documentation design balances thoroughness against the reality that palliative encounters are long and clinicians resist adding structured entry to already lengthy visits.
Discovery and Capture Review
Discovery reviews billing capture against services delivered, since programs commonly provide advance care planning without documenting it billably.
Consult Workflow Design
Consult routing is designed for the settings you cover, since inpatient and community consults have different urgency and documentation patterns.
Assessment Configuration
Instruments are configured with clinicians, balancing measurement value against the burden of structured entry during long encounters.
Documentation Design
Goals of care documentation is structured enough for continuity and billing without reducing nuanced conversations to checkbox summaries.
Directive Accessibility
Directive storage is designed for retrieval at decision points, including availability to treating teams outside the palliative service.
Rollout and Ongoing Support
Rollout expands by setting with capture monitoring and continuing support as billing rules and program scope change.
Technology and Compliance
Palliative care operates under standard clinical documentation and HIPAA requirements, with billing rules governing advance care planning and time-based services carrying specific documentation requirements. Advance directives and POLST have state-specific forms and portability considerations. Taction holds ISO 27001 certification and follows HIPAA-aligned engineering practice. The documentation point worth emphasis is that goals of care records inform decisions made by other teams, so accessibility matters as much as completeness.
HIPAA-Aligned Engineering
Builds apply encryption, role-based access, and complete audit logging. Our HIPAA compliance software development practice defines these controls.
Advance Care Planning Billing
Billing requirements for advance care planning specify time and content, and failing to document them means delivering the service without capture.
Advance Directive Portability
Directive forms vary by state and portability is imperfect, so systems must handle documents originating outside the organization.
Cross-Team Accessibility
Goals of care records inform decisions by treating teams, so accessibility outside the palliative service determines whether documentation helps.
Concurrent Care Distinction
Palliative is not hospice, and conflating them in documentation or eligibility logic creates both clinical and billing errors.
Deployment Security
Deployments run in your cloud tenancy or hybrid, with network segmentation, signed container images, and documented penetration testing before release.
Why Choose Taction Software
Taction Software was founded in 2013 and has spent over 12 years building healthcare software, delivering more than 200 healthcare projects from four US offices in Chicago, Cheyenne, Austin, and Sacramento, with ISO 27001 certification. Our relevant attention here is billing capture, since palliative programs commonly deliver advance care planning without documenting it billably, and closing that gap directly affects whether a subsidized program survives review. Our leadership brings more than 20 years of personal experience in the field.
01
Billing Capture Focus
We address advance care planning documentation, since programs frequently deliver the service without meeting the specific capture requirements.
02
Documentation Without Reduction
We structure goals of care records enough for continuity and billing without reducing nuanced conversations to checkboxes clinicians resent.
03
Established Healthcare Focus
Founded in 2013, we have concentrated on healthcare rather than treating it as one vertical among several, producing depth in clinical workflow.
04
Cross-Setting Experience
Our work spans inpatient and community delivery, which palliative programs increasingly cover simultaneously with different requirements.
05
Interdisciplinary Support
We build for team-based documentation, since physician-only records lose the social work and chaplaincy contribution central to palliative care.
06
Certified Security Posture
ISO 27001 certification means security controls are documented and auditable, supporting your vendor risk assessment efficiently.
Pricing
Palliative care software pricing depends on settings covered, team size, integration with existing clinical systems, and whether community delivery is in scope. Cross-setting programs cost more than single-setting services and reflect how most palliative programs actually operate. Discovery produces an itemized, fixed-scope estimate with phase-level breakdown. Mobile devices, cloud infrastructure, and integration fees are separate from engineering cost and itemized clearly.
MVP or Single Module
An MVP covering consult workflow and symptom assessment typically runs $40,000 to $80,000 for a single-setting service.
Full Platform Build
A full platform with cross-setting delivery, documentation, directives, and billing capture typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000.
Enterprise Deployment
Enterprise engagements covering health system programs, community delivery, and full integration start at $200,000.
Discovery Phase Scoping
Discovery is a paid, time-boxed phase producing an itemized estimate, architecture plan, and billing capture assessment.
Cost Drivers to Expect
Setting count, integration breadth, community delivery scope, and team size are the largest variables, identified during discovery.
Ongoing Support Costs
Post-launch billing rule changes, instrument updates, and support are quoted separately as a retainer sized to program size.
Get Started
If you are evaluating palliative care software for consult workflow, symptom assessment, goals of care documentation, or billing capture, the fastest next step is a discovery call with our team. We will review current capture rates and settings covered, then return an itemized, fixed-scope estimate. Contact us to schedule that conversation.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Palliative program leaders evaluating palliative care software usually ask how it differs from hospice systems, whether documentation adds burden, and how billing capture improves. The answers below reflect how we scope these projects.
Palliative care runs concurrently with curative treatment and has no prognosis requirement, so eligibility, billing, and coordination all differ. Hospice software built around per diem payment and terminal certification does not fit palliative practice, and adapting it produces both clinical and billing errors.
Some, which is why we configure it carefully. Palliative encounters are long and conversation-centered, and clinicians reasonably resist reducing them to structured fields. We capture the elements that support continuity and billing while leaving narrative space for what matters clinically.
By prompting the specific documentation advance care planning billing requires, including time and content elements. Programs frequently deliver these conversations without recording what capture requires, which means providing a billable service and not billing for it.
An MVP covering consults and assessment runs $40,000 to $80,000. A full cross-setting platform typically falls between $80,000 and $200,000. Enterprise health system deployments start at $200,000. Setting count and integration drive cost most.
They should, and that accessibility is a design priority. Goals of care records exist to inform decisions made by oncologists, intensivists, and hospitalists. Documentation locked inside a palliative service record helps nobody at the moment a decision is being made.
Yes, including documents originating outside your organization. State forms vary and portability is imperfect, so the system must store, surface, and version directives regardless of origin rather than only handling forms it generated.